DIALECTICS OF MY PROFESSIONAL LIFE: A CRITICAL AUTOETHNOGRAPIC INQUIRY
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This dissertation portrays my lived experiences in educational journey and
makes an exploration into my pedagogical practices as a student, teacher, teacher
trainer and novice researcher. In this research, I have presented my experiences acting
as a student, acting as a teacher and acting as a novice researcher. While presenting
my different experiences, I found my professional life carrying different perspectives,
so it relates with my pedagogy practices. While presenting my experiences as a
student, I found I was playing the role as an oppressed learner. At that time, I thought
mathematics is carrying absolutist term but when I present my experiences as a
teacher then my role was found to be an oppressor. At that time I think mathematics is
an incomplete and everlasting process (Ernest, 2005). At last, in the researching
phase, I came to know about the cause of the oppressing situation. It relates to our
pedagogical practices, relationship between students and teachers, active learner,
classroom environment, students centered pedagogy. It will help me to develop as a
transformative learner (Habermas, 1972) and critically examine my value and
practices. In this research study, I used multi paradigms to shape my dissertation
under autoethnography method. I have used postmodern approach with multiple
ii
genres of writing such as poems, narratives. The aim of my research work was to find
out why students like me found teachers' behavior oppressing. When I prepared the
proposal of my research work, I had only the experience of being a student at different
levels. During that time, I thought I was oppressed by the teachers and then when
writing this dissertation I get involved in the teaching field and got the experience of
teaching. Now the observation and experience helped me to produce the data and
critically analyze them.
When I started teaching, I found my behavior to be also like that of my
teacher, where I also oppressed my students due to their less interest in the study. And
I thought it was a cyclic process of education. But when I came to the researching
phase, I observed the practice critically, and came to know that it was guided by the
pedagogy of the oppressed. I realize that educator and teacher must focus on
children’s interest, they should know children's intelligent, they should play different
roles at different times. And we have to follow constructivism and collaborative
approach. Most of the teachers are habitual to their daily teaching but students are
new for the class. So, teachers can teach students at the students' level of
understanding. Moreover, the relationship between students and teachers should be
close so that students do not feel any kind of discrimination from their tutors.
Similarly, teachers can create a student centered learning environment, establish better
relationship with students, give practical education, involve students actively in
classroom activities and promote meaningful practice.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Acharya, D.K.(2013).Dialectics of my professional life: A critical autoethnograpic inquiry.
